Is EEG safe to use? Are there any potential risks or side effects of using the EEG for extended periods of time?
EEG devices are generally safe with no known side effects and risks, especially when compared to invasive devices like implants. We use saline solution to lower electrical impedance and improve conductance. The solution could cause minor skin irritation when the net is used for extended periods of time, hence we mix the solution with baby shampoo to mitigate this.
How does the system ensure user safety, particularly in the context of real-world tasks with varying environments and unpredictable events?
On top of our 100% decoding accuracy, we implement an EEG-controlled safety mechanism to confirm or interrupt robot actions with muscle tension, as decoded through clenching. Nevertheless, it is important to note that the current implementation entails a 500ms delay when interrupting robot actions which might lead to a potential risk in more dynamic tasks. With more training data using a shorter decoding window, the issue can be potentially mitigated.
Can EEG / NOIR be applied to different people? Given that the paper has only been tested on three human subjects, how can the authors justify the generalizability of the findings?
The EEG device employed in our research is versatile, catering to both adults and children as young as five years old. Accompanied by SensorNets of varying sizes, the device ensures compatibility with different head dimensions. Our decoding methods have been thoughtfully designed with diversity and inclusion in mind, drawing upon two prominent EEG signals: steady-state visually evoked potential and motor imagery. These signals have exhibited efficacy across a wide range of individuals. However, it is important to acknowledge that the interface of our system, NOIR, is exclusively visual in nature, rendering it unsuitable for individuals with severe visual impairments.
Can EEG be used outside the lab?
While mobile EEG devices offer portability, it is worth noting that they often exhibit a comparatively much lower signal-to-noise ratio. Various sources contribute to the noise present in EEG signals, including muscle movements, eye movements, power lines, and interference from other devices. These sources of noise exist in and outside of the lab; consequently, though we've chosen to implement robust decoding techniques based on classical statistics, more robust further filtering techniques to mitigate these unwanted artifacts and extract meaningful information accurately are needed for greater success in more chaotic environments.
How does the system differentiate between intentional brain signals for task execution and other unrelated brain activity? How will you address potential issues of privacy and security?
The decoding algorithms employed in our study were purposefully engineered to exclusively capture task-relevant signals, ensuring the exclusion of any extraneous information. Adhering to the principles of data privacy and in compliance with the guidelines set by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for human research, the data collected from participants during calibration and experimental sessions were promptly deleted following the conclusion of each experiment. Only the decoded signals, stripped of any identifying information, were retained for further analysis.
How scalable is the robotics system? Can it be easily adapted to different robot platforms or expanded to accommodate a broader range of tasks beyond the 20 household activities tested?
Within the context of our study, two notable constraints are the speed of decoding and the availability of primitive skills. The former restricts the range of tasks to those that do not involve time-sensitive and dynamic interactions, such as capturing a moving object. However, the advancement in decoding accuracy and the reduction of the decoding window duration may eventually address this limitation. These improvements can potentially be achieved through the utilization of larger training datasets and the implementation of machine-learning-based decoding models, leveraging the high temporal resolution offered by EEG.
The development of a comprehensive library of primitive skills stands as a long-term objective in the field of robotics research. This entails creating a repertoire of fundamental abilities that can be adapted and combined to address new tasks. Additionally, our findings indicate that human users possess the ability to innovate and devise novel applications of existing skills to accomplish tasks, akin to the way humans employ tools.
How exactly do both individuals with and without disabilities benefit from this BRI system?
The potential applications of systems like NOIR in the future are vast and diverse. One significant area where these systems can have a profound impact is in assisting individuals with disabilities, particularly those with mobility-related impairments. By enabling these individuals to accomplish Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living tasks, such systems can greatly enhance their independence and overall quality of life.
Currently, individuals without disabilities may initially find the BRI pipeline to have a learning curve, resulting in inefficiencies compared to their own performance in daily activities in their first few attempts. However, robot learning methods hold the promise of addressing these inefficiencies over time, and enable robots to help their users when needed.